四大出版集团
爱思唯尔(Elsevier): CELL
斯普林格(Springer): NATURE, BMC
威立(Wiley): LANCET
泰勒(Taylor):
其他
AAAS:Science
AMA: JAMA
BMJ: BMJ
MMA: NEJM
四大出版集团
爱思唯尔(Elsevier): CELL
斯普林格(Springer): NATURE, BMC
威立(Wiley): LANCET
泰勒(Taylor):
其他
AAAS:Science
AMA: JAMA
BMJ: BMJ
MMA: NEJM
Cover Letter
Title Page
Abstract
Highlights (optional)
Research in context (optional)
Manuscript
Figures
Tables
Supplementary Material
Instructions + 期刊名称

Title: 标题
Abstract/Summary: 摘要
Introduction/Background: 引言
Methods: 方法
Results: 结果
Discussion: 讨论
Other sections: Conclusion, Acknowledgements, Data Availability Statement, etc.
References: 参考文献

ABC原则:Abstract, Best journal and Cover letter
这三者决定了你的论文是否会被送到审稿环节。
Abstract: 摘要是论文的“门面”,直接影响编辑和审稿人是否会对你的研究感兴趣。一个高质量的摘要应当具备以下特点:
大多数科研人员认为简短、精练、简单是在撰写学术论文摘要时要遵循的几个要素,但芝加哥大学(University of Chicago)的研究人员在研究了100万篇学术论文摘要之后发现:长篇幅、辞藻华丽、大量运用专业术语的摘要反而会使论文的引用率更高。
ABC原则:Abstract, Best journal and Cover letter
Best Journal: 选择合适的期刊至关重要,以下是几个关键考虑因素:
ABC原则:Abstract, Best journal and Cover letter
Cover Letter: 投稿信是与编辑沟通的第一封信件,它应该简洁、有力、个性化。优秀的Cover Letter通常包含以下要素:
语言习惯和思维差异
专有名词不混用,上下文表述统一,避免直译
infection vs. transmission
isolate vs. quarantine
forecast vs. predict

词汇量匮乏
写作过程中使用词汇单调,特别是动词和副词。
Use: Adopt
However: In contrast, whereas
Moreover: Furthermore
And: Additionally
So: Consequently, accordingly
Study: work, examine
等等
忌讳过度复杂!!!!
我们常常会使用提示词(prompt)来帮助我们更好地理解论文的内容、结构以及需要改进的地方。提示词是指在修改过程中,通过向AI提供一些关键问题或引导,帮助其更清晰地表达观点、改进语言和逻辑结构。提示词通常是针对论文中的特定问题或潜在错误提出的具体问题。
提示词的形式:
具体问题: “本段是否清晰阐述了研究背景?”、“这个结论是否有足够的证据支持?”
语言改进建议: “这句话可以简化吗?”、“此处有没有重复使用的词汇?”
结构性问题: “段落的主题句是否明确?”、“此部分的逻辑是否流畅?”
针对不同论文部分编写不同的提示词。
### **Role**
A professional editor specializing in refining academic papers for publication in *Nature* journal.
### **Attention**
Focus on enhancing language, style, and structure to align with *Nature*'s editorial standards. Ensure clarity, conciseness, and scientific rigor while maintaining the author's intended meaning.
### **Description**
The editor meticulously reviews scientific manuscripts, refining their linguistic precision, logical flow, and adherence to *Nature*'s formatting and stylistic conventions. The goal is to elevate the paper’s readability, coherence, and impact while preserving the scientific integrity of the research.
### **Goals**
- Improve clarity and conciseness without altering the scientific meaning.
- Ensure the manuscript follows *Nature*'s house style, including appropriate structure, tone, and formatting.
- Enhance logical flow and coherence across sections.
- Strengthen the precision of technical terminology and argumentation.
- Eliminate redundancy, ambiguity, and inconsistencies.
- Ensure grammatical correctness and refine stylistic elements for readability.
### **Skills**
- Advanced expertise in scientific editing and academic writing.
- Strong understanding of *Nature*'s editorial standards and publication requirements.
- Ability to enhance clarity and logical flow while preserving the author’s voice.
- Proficiency in grammar, syntax, and scientific terminology.
- Experience in structuring complex research findings into a compelling narrative.
- Attention to detail in fact-checking, citation formatting, and consistency.
### **Constraints**
- Maintain the scientific integrity and accuracy of the research.
- Preserve the original meaning and argumentation of the authors.
- Adhere to *Nature*'s word limits and formatting guidelines.
- Avoid over-editing that may alter the research conclusions.
- Respect confidentiality and intellectual property rights.Role(角色)
Attention(注意点)
Description(描述)
Goals(目标)
Skills(技能)
Constraints(约束条件)
Instruction for authors
文章的基本要求
AI工具
这是是China CDC weekly的Instruction for authors,我正在计划编写一篇文章提交过去,这个文章需要润色修改,请你帮我编写对应的英文提示词,用于指示AI对我输入的手稿修改润色。
XXXX

部分杂志编辑会在投稿后对论文进行查重,如果发现论文中有大量重复内容,可能会拒绝发表。一般来说,学术论文的重复率不应超过10%,否则可能会被认为是抄袭。
首先,查重工具推荐使用iThenticate和CrossCheck,大部分期刊都会使用这两个工具进行查重。
其次,查重工具是通过比对论文中的文字与数据库中的文献进行比对,从而判断论文的重复率。因此,对于未发表的论文不会被查重工具检测到。
最后,查重工具的结果并不是绝对准确的,有时会出现误差。因此,如果查重结果显示重复率较高,可以通过修改论文中的重复内容来降低重复率。
目前,市面上有很多AI降重工具,但是大多数都是小公司,可能无法保证论文信息不被泄露,因此我们可以直接使用大公司的AI工具,通过编写合适的prompt来指导AI进行降重。
请编写一个prompt,指导AI对以下手稿进行降重。
我编写了一个英文学术论文,但是论文逻辑性和学术性存在缺陷,并且论文的重复率过高,请你编写一个英文的prompt帮我指导降重。由Prompt Engineer生成的Prompt:
You are a professional academic editor and expert in enhancing the logical structure, academic rigor, and originality of research papers. Your task is to refine the given academic paper while adhering to the following requirements:
Improve Logical Flow: Ensure the paper follows a coherent and well-structured argument. Adjust transitions between sections and paragraphs for smoother readability. Clarify any ambiguous statements and strengthen the logical progression of ideas.
Enhance Academic Quality: Elevate the academic tone by using precise terminology and formal expressions suitable for scholarly writing. Improve sentence structures and remove informal or redundant language. Strengthen arguments with well-supported evidence and ensure clarity in research methodology and analysis.
Reduce Similarity Rate: Rewrite sections with high similarity while preserving their original meaning. Use paraphrasing, rewording, and restructuring to ensure uniqueness. Avoid direct quotations unless necessary and provide alternative ways to present key findings and arguments.
Maintain Consistency and Formatting: Ensure adherence to academic writing standards, including proper citation styles (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.). Ensure consistent use of terminology, tense, and structure throughout the paper.
Check for Clarity and Readability: Remove redundant phrases, clarify complex ideas, and simplify overly complicated sentence structures while maintaining academic sophistication.
Please refine the following paper while ensuring all these requirements are met. Provide an improved version with detailed explanations of the changes where necessary.
Introduction/Background: 简述研究背景和意义,你研究了什么问题,为什么重要。
Methods: 描述研究方法,包括实验设计、数据采集、分析方法等。
Results: 展示研究结果,包括数据、图表、统计分析等。
Discussion: 分析研究结果,讨论结论的科学意义和可能的影响,以及研究的局限性和未来方向。
段落之间的逻辑关系:确保段落之间的逻辑关系清晰,避免跳跃性和断裂性。适当使用过渡句,确保段落之间的衔接自然流畅。
句子之间的逻辑关系:表述顺畅,句子之间的逻辑关系清晰,避免句子之间的逻辑矛盾和不连贯。专有名词表述统一,缩写词使用规范。
请编写一个prompt,指导AI对以下手稿进行逻辑性和可读性的提升。
我编写了一个英文学术论文,这个是论文Introduction部分,但是逻辑性和可读性存在缺陷,请你编写一个英文的prompt帮我指导提升逻辑性和可读性。由Prompt Engineer生成的Prompt:
You are an experienced academic editor with expertise in refining research papers for clarity, coherence, and logical structure. Your task is to enhance the Introduction section of the given paper while maintaining its academic rigor. Follow these guidelines:
Improve Logical Flow: Ensure that the Introduction follows a clear, structured progression:
Start with a broad background on the topic to establish context.
Clearly identify the research gap or problem statement.
Present the research objectives and significance concisely.
End with an overview of the paper structure if necessary.
Enhance Readability:
Simplify overly complex or wordy sentences while maintaining academic formality.
Use precise academic language and avoid redundancy.
Improve transitions between sentences and paragraphs for smoother reading.
Strengthen Academic Rigor:
Replace vague or general statements with more specific, well-supported claims.
Ensure that key concepts are clearly introduced and logically connected.
Maintain a formal and objective academic tone.
Refine Clarity and Engagement:
Ensure that the research motivation is clearly communicated.
Make the introduction engaging while maintaining scholarly professionalism.
Please rewrite the Introduction section according to these requirements, ensuring improved clarity, coherence, and logical flow. Provide a refined version with explanations of the key improvements made.
请编写一个prompt,指导AI对自己论文的Introduction部分进行逻辑性和可读性的提升。
请编写一个prompt,指导AI对自己论文的Methods部分进行降重。
审稿意见是指审稿人对论文的评价和建议,通常包括对论文的优点和不足之处,以及对作者的修改建议。审稿意见对于作者来说是非常重要的,因为它可以帮助作者改进论文,提高论文的质量和学术价值。
常见的审稿意见包括:Major Revision(需要重大修改)、Minor Revision(需要小修改)等。
一般来说,审稿意见分为两种类型:一种是直接接受的意见,另一种是需要修改的意见。对于直接接受的意见,作者可以直接采纳;对于需要修改的意见,作者需要根据审稿人的建议对论文进行修改。
| 类型 | 回复方式 |
|---|---|
| 直接接受 | 感谢审稿人的建议,表示接受,如拼写错误、格式问题等 |
| 创新性问题 | 说明自己的研究创新性,重在凝练和展示 |
| 合理性问题 | 补充数据、分析方法等,以证明结论的合理性 |
| 逻辑性问题 | 重点突出论文的逻辑性,避免跳跃性和断裂性 |
| 语言问题 | 重点突出论文的语言表达,避免冗长和模糊 |
| 笼统的问题 | 自己不懂审稿专家到底是什么意思? |
| 无法接受的问题 | 说明自己的立场,如不同意审稿人的观点 |
审稿意见的回复应该遵循以下原则:
感谢审稿人的建议,表示感激和尊重。
明确回复审稿人的意见,确保审稿人能够理解。
点对点回复,确保每个问题都有明确的回复。
位置明确,确保审稿人能够找到回复,in line回复。
可以尝试用不同的AI工具来回复审稿意见,以提高回复的效率和质量。以下是一个示例:
You are an academic researcher writing a rebuttal letter to address reviewers' comments on your manuscript submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. Your goal is to respond clearly and professionally, incorporating revisions where necessary, providing explanations when needed, and maintaining a respectful and constructive tone.
Response Format
Opening Acknowledgment
Express gratitude for the reviewers’ time and effort in evaluating your manuscript.
Highlight your commitment to improving the paper based on their valuable suggestions.
Point-by-Point Responses
Reviewer’s Comment #1 (quote the original comment)
Your Response:
If the suggestion was implemented, specify what was changed and where (include section/page numbers).
If you respectfully disagree, provide a clear and evidence-backed explanation.
Reviewer’s Comment #2 (quote the original comment)
Your Response:
Repeat the structured response format for each comment.它可以读取你的稿件全文和comments,帮你节省50%的时间,而且语言地道流畅。但需要你补充和优化细节。
它回复的很好的部分:比如语言错误、maior comments;部分的礼貌性总体回复,需要补充的内容、更正的错误,以及邮件开头和和结尾;
需要你补充完善的部分:补充的实验的细节、结果;需要展示的补充的Table或Figure,关于某个概念或观点的探讨等。它的背景知知识还是没有作者深厚的。
我们可以在AI给我们的这个草稿的基础上,对于重点部分进行一个优化和补充。